Search

Library Entry

Eval13: Panel Session 444 - Evaluation Rubrics: What, Why, and How

A basic introduction to the "what, why, and how" of evaluation rubrics - from Jane Davidson

2013-10 AEA Intro to Rubrics - what why how.pdf

Library Entry

Eval13: Panel Session 444 - Evaluation Rubrics: What, Why, and How

Presentation at AEA 2013 conference as part of the panel titled: "Evaluation rubrics: What, why, and how" with Jane Davidson, Monica Pinto and Michael Scriven. The panel was designed to help participants understand what evaluation rubrics methodology is, why it is so important, and some tips for applying it successfully

AEA'13 - Apres Thomaz 2013-10-18.pdf

Library Entry

AEA 2013 Annual Conference: Rountable Presentation - Creating an Evaluation Rubric: Building Evaluation Capacity Within the Dallas Independent School District

Attached is the Dallas ISD evaluation rubric and a 2-page description for use #capacity #methods #rubric #Instruments

2 attachments

Library Entry

Eval13: The Value of Rubrics in Messy Non-Profit Evaluation Contexts

Examples of real world use of different kinds of evaluation rubrics in non-profit contexts

131018 Rubrics preso AEA McKegg vxx km.pptx

Library Entry

Eval11 Session 102: The Rubric Revolution: Evaluative blending of mixed method evidence

This 90-minute demo from Jane Davidson gives a whirlwind tour of the wonderful world of evaluative rubrics, as outlined in her textbook, Evaluation Methodology Basics: The nuts and bolts of sound evaluation (Sage, 2005), and as applied in many different ways all over the world. #evaluative #Rubrics #MixedMethodsEvaluation #EvaluationUse #utilization #nuts-and-bolts #Prek-12EducationalEvaluation #values #real-world #participatory #Questions #HowTo #Instruments #TheoriesofEvaluation #AssessmentinHigherEducation #Collaborative,ParticipatoryandEmpowermentEval #2011Conference #tools

AEA 2011 Rubric Revolution demo 90min.pdf

Library Entry

Evaluation rubrics: how to ensure transparent and clear assessment that respects diverse lines of evidence

This report provides a detailed description of an evaluation, written by Judy Oakden, as part of the first BetterEvaluation writeshop process, led by Irene Guijt. Peer reviewers for this report were Carolyn Kabore and Irene Guijt. Excerpt: Independent external evaluators generally have to...

Library Entry

Eval 2013, Poster #78: Plans, Approaches, Needs, Context, & Reality: Meta-Evaluation of a Portfolio of External Climate Education Projects Funded by NASA

Given the context of climate change education, we also consider the units of analysis and units of change assessed across the portfolio, to determine the extent to which broader questions about community or stewardship behaviors are addressed by such a portfolio. The meta-evaluative rubric was based on key questions related to the Program Evaluation Standards of utility, feasibility, and accuracy; draws from prior meta-evaluation work; and considers the NICE context and the concerns of the environmental and STEM education evaluation communities

Martin_AEA2013_Poster.pdf

Library Entry

Eval11 Poster 52: Evaluating the Re-visioning of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG) Teacher Education Undergraduate Programs through a Teacher Quality Partnership Grant (TQP)

Utilizing the developed NC Teacher Evaluation Rubric which operationalizes NCPTS

ENRICH Revisioning Poster Handouts.pdf