1 to 10 of 167
Sort by

Library Entry
SI11 Session 17: Transformative Mixed Methods Evaluations

Handout from session at 2011 AEA/CDC Summer Evaluation Institute Session Description: This workshop focuses on the methodological and contextual considerations in designing and conducting transformative mixed methods evaluation

2 attachments

Focus Search - Methodology: Qualitative (dialogic)/ Quantitative mix; Context AEA/CDC Professional Development Institute Transformative Paradigm: Philosophy AEA/CDC Professional Development Institute Concurrent and Sequential Mixed Method Designs Sequential Design: Qualitative followed by quantitative; Sequential Design: Quantitative followed by qualitative; Concurrent Design: Quantitative and qualitative methods used together. AEA/CDC Professional Development Institute AEA/CDC Professional Development Institute * * Community Participation AEA/CDC Professional Development Institute AEA/CDC Professional Development Institute From Mertens (2009) * Example: Making Visible Botswana youth: addressing power inequities in the fight against HIV/AIDS using a transformative lens * AEA/CDC Professional Development Institute * AEA/CDC Professional Development Institute Transformative Mixed Methods Design Mertens Bridgewater April 2011 Interactive Post tests: Quant Qual; Behavior & Policy Change; Transfer To other contexts Mertens Bridgewater April 2011 Interactive Example of Mixed Method Transformative Approach Trenton Obesity Prevention Study Identified world view of evaluators and partners Identified community members to involve Developed process to work with one another Redesigned original research proposal to reflect mixed-methods approach Used a qualitative sequential mixed method design 5

Library Entry
Session 855: Rapid Response Methods for Real-time Evaluation

Identifies principles of real-time evaluation and methods that emphasize timing, flexibility, and responsiveness

2 attachments

Focus Search - This method is repeatable over time if the advocacy strategy takes place over multiple years

Library Entry
Performance Evaluation as a Distinct Hybrid Form of Research Methods

Performance evaluation should be viewed as an applied hybrid method distinct from program evaluation (defined by Peter Rossi) which combines methods from four different institutions each speaking a different policy language (Policy, Management, Programs and Accountability) as well as mixed methods. This includes two meta-data issues: Process Management ((the method of the “business process”) includes the management using participatory evaluation of a process-based chain of events leading to desired outcome(s)) and Research Metrics (a solid grounding in the “facts” about whether there is progress towards desired goals)

Library Entry
Using Participatory Methods to Develop an Evaluation Framework: A Case Study

Powerpoint presented at the 2009 American Evaluation Association conference. #Cluster,Multi-SiteandMulti-LevelEval #Collaborative,ParticipatoryandEmpowermentEval #Evaluation2009 #2009Conference


Library Entry
Eval16_Using Evaluation Tools, Methods, and Thinking in Planning NIH Common Fund Programs

We present how a combination of methods grounded in evaluation practice inform strategic planning for biomedical research programs managed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Common Fund. Frequently used methods include analysis of the NIH research portfolio, landscape scans to identify other funding entities in the research area, and review of the scientific literature

Using Eval Tools Methods Thinking in Planning_AEA 10-29-2016.pdf