This entry contains the PDF of Poster 231 presented on October 15, 2014 during Evaluation 2014's Session 1749. Overview of IRH methods for conducting evaluations with adolescents
7 attachments
AEA 2011 Presentation In order for course evaluations in postsecondary education to be appropriately valued, the process and instruments need to support effectively different evaluation goals. In this paper we present a case study of how summative and formative uses of course evaluation data are affected by a one-size-fits-all approach, and suggest an alternative approach
Multipurpose_Course_Evaluations_AEA_2011.pptx
This session demonstrates how a diagnostic tool, known as evaluability assessment (EA), can be leveraged to capture the conceptualization and logical structure (aka: program theory) embedded within academic programs. Participants will learn about EA and observe how it generates practical graphic models of how a learning intervention works; guides question formation for formative or summative purposes; and, informs the design of useable evaluation(s) that capture varying levels of impact
Demo Session 317_10 25 2012 Evaluability Assessment.pptx
PowerPoint presentation in the Higher Education Evaluation and Assessment track for the Eval 2014 conference. The presentation describes a recent study of teaching faculty about the strategies used to increase response rates on end-of-course evaluations. Study methodology, results and implications are included
2 attachments
Abstract: The original purpose of end-of-course evaluation was to provide formative feedback to faculty. However, as the focus shifted to inform decisions about instructors’ performance, questions have been raised about the adequacy of end-of-course evaluation instruments for summative purposes
AEA_2011_Document_Analysis_Handout_Packet.pdf